rivers_bend (
rivers_bend) wrote2007-10-20 08:11 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Well, it was new to me
I've been seeing the news about JK's outing of Dumbledore all over my f'list but only this morning saw:
"Oh, my god," Rowling concluded with a laugh, "the fan fiction."
source
"Oh, my god," Rowling concluded with a laugh, "the fan fiction."
source
no subject
And you know, I bet she does.
Whilst laughing and/or clutching her hand to her mouth in awe-struck horror.
"Oh God, what hath I wrought?!"
Mind you, as I commented to
I suppose he did opt for glamorous robes and curly shoes rather more often than some...
And does this render McGonagall a fag hag?
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
And my daughter is dancing around saying "I *thought* so!" and I'm just more convinced than ever that sub-text should be renamed dom-text:))
Kat
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Mind, I've only read one of the book and seen three of the movies, but I still would have prefered if one of the characters in the primary age group was the one she outed--I mean, the Weasleys alone had to have had at least one gay child, statistically, right?
(no subject)
no subject
Call me cynical, but it just feels like such an afterthought, y'know?